Loamy Sand Soil
Loamy sand is sand with just enough silt and clay to hold a ball when moist. It still drains fast and holds little water. Below: the exact USDA cutoffs, how it differs from sandy loam, and where it covers the most ground.[1][2][3]
Is your soil loamy sand?
Enter an address to see the surface texture USDA maps there.
US addresses only: street address, city and state, or ZIP.
Loamy sand
What makes a soil loamy sand
Loamy sand is the step between sand and sandy loam. The Soil Survey Manual defines it as 70 to 90% sand, with the silt percentage plus 1.5 times the clay at 15 or more, and the silt plus twice the clay under 30.[1] On the triangle: 15 ≤ silt + 1.5 × clay and silt + 2 × clay < 30.
Those two sums do the sorting. The first lifts a soil out of pure sand: there is enough silt and clay to bind the grains a little. The second caps the fines, because once silt plus twice the clay reaches 30 the soil counts as sandy loam instead.[1]
The margin is thin. Our texture classifier calls an 88/8/4 sand/silt/clay mix sand; move two points from sand to clay (86/8/6) and it becomes loamy sand, and by 75/15/10 it is already sandy loam. By feel, moist loamy sand forms a ball when you squeeze it but won’t push out into a ribbon.[2]
Loamy sand vs sandy loam
The two names use the same words in reverse order, and the classes share a border on the triangle, but they are not interchangeable. Loamy sand is the sandier one and won’t ribbon. Sandy loam carries more silt and clay (silt plus twice the clay of 30 or more), makes a short, gritty ribbon, and holds noticeably more water, as the sandy loam page shows. Here are the three sandy classes side by side in USDA’s survey.[1][2]
| Median topsoil | Sand | Loamy sand | Sandy loam |
|---|---|---|---|
| Water per foot (in) | 0.84 | 1.1 | 1.6 |
| Water movement (µm/s) | 92 | 92 | 28 |
| Organic matter | 0.90% | 1.3% | 1.5% |
| Excessively drained acres | 52.0% | 33.1% | 10.1% |
| Hydrologic group A | 65.2% | 50.8% | 20.1% |
| Prime farmland | 0.3% | 10.6% | 11.8% |
Excessively drained includes somewhat excessively drained. Shares are of each class’s acres with a recorded value.
How loamy sand handles water
Water goes through it fast. Loamy sand topsoils hold a median 1.1 inches of plant-available water per foot, less than every class except sand, and water moves through them at 92 µm/s, about 13 inches an hour, the same median as pure sand. Organic matter is low too, a median 1.3%.[3]
| Property | Median | Components |
|---|---|---|
| Water it holds | 1.1 in per foot of soil | n = 56,720 |
| How fast water moves | 92 µm/s · High | n = 56,818 |
| Bulk density | 1.53 g/cm³ | n = 56,755 |
| Organic matter | 1.3% | n = 56,806 |
| Shrink-swell (LEP) | 1.4% · low | n = 56,794 |
Drainage is the other side of that. 33.1% of loamy-sand acres are excessively or somewhat excessively drained and another 44.3% are well drained.[4] 50.8% sit in hydrologic soil group A, where water soaks in freely and runoff stays low even when the soil is wet, a share second only to sand.[5]
It is not always dry ground, though. 14.1% of the class is somewhat poorly to very poorly drained, and 12.3% carries a dual group such as A/D, where the first letter applies only once the land is drained.[5] On a wet loamy sand, sort out the drainage before you choose plants.
On the usual dry ground, water little and often. Purdue’s advice for lawns on sandy soil is to irrigate more often and in smaller amounts than on heavier soils;[6] the full routine is in the sandy-soil lawn guide.
Loamy coarse sand, loamy fine sand and loamy very fine sand
Like sand and sandy loam, loamy sand takes a modifier when one grade of sand dominates. The Soil Survey Manual sets the thresholds:[1]
- Loamy coarse sand: a total of 25% or more very coarse and coarse sand, with less than 50% of any other single grade.
- Loamy sand (no modifier): a total of 25% or more very coarse, coarse and medium sand, less than 25% very coarse and coarse sand, and less than 50% each of fine and very fine sand; or 25% or more very coarse and coarse sand together with 50% or more medium sand.
- Loamy fine sand: 50% or more fine sand, or less than 50% very fine sand with a total of less than 25% very coarse, coarse and medium sand.
- Loamy very fine sand: 50% or more very fine sand.
The grades run from very coarse sand (2.0 to 1.0 mm across) down to very fine sand (0.10 to 0.05 mm); the full table is on the sand page.[1]
The grade changes how easily the soil washes or blows away. Minnesota’s stormwater manual rates fine and very fine sands as highly erosive and medium to coarse sands as less so.[7] The full erodibility ladder is on the silt page.
Is loamy sand good for gardens and crops?
Better than pure sand, by USDA’s land-capability ratings: 53% of rated loamy-sand acres fall in Classes I–IV, the classes suited to cultivation, against 42% for pure sand.[8] Where the land falls short, the recorded reason is most often erosion (subclass e, 48%) or a root-zone limit (s, 28%), and 10.6% is mapped prime farmland.[3][9]
For a garden bed the fix is organic matter. Colorado State University recommends well-decomposed compost or aged manure on sandy soils to help them hold water and nutrients.[10] How much to add is on how to improve sandy soil, and the plants that take dry, sandy ground as it is are on plants for sandy soil. Test pH as well: 56.1% of loamy-sand acres are acid in the survey (see how to raise or lower soil pH).
Where loamy sand is found
- 1. Texas: 11.7M
- 2. Georgia: 10.7M
- 3. California: 8.9M
- 4. New Mexico: 6.4M
- 5. Michigan: 5.9M
- 6. Nebraska: 5.3M
Measured against each state’s own soil, the ranking changes: loamy sand covers 32% of Georgia’s classified acres, 20% of South Carolina’s and 19% of Michigan’s.[3]
Most widespread loamy sand soil series
| Series | Acres | Most in | Survey areas |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tifton | 1,530,855 | Georgia | 38 |
| Pelham | 1,486,686 | Georgia | 83 |
| Dothan | 1,411,326 | Georgia | 69 |
| Fuquay | 1,370,162 | Georgia | 76 |
| Norfolk | 1,365,211 | North Carolina | 90 |
Of the 5 most widespread loamy-sand series, 4 are mapped mostly in Georgia. The largest, Tifton, is a very deep, well-drained soil of the Coastal Plain uplands that formed in loamy marine deposits.[11]
Loamy sand, loam and clay compared
Loamy sand sits near the sand corner of the triangle and clay near the opposite one, with loam between. Colorado State University sums up the two ends: sandy soils drain quickly and don’t hold water and nutrients well, while clay soils hold a lot of both but drain slowly and get very hard when dry.[2] The particles behind the three are on sand, silt and clay.
Digging and building on loamy sand
Shrink-swell is not a worry here: the median linear extensibility of loamy-sand topsoils is 1.4%, in USDA’s low class.[12]
Trenches are another matter. OSHA lists loamy sand with sand and gravel as granular Type C soil, the least stable of its three excavation types, and a competent person still has to classify each trench on site.[13] How the engineering systems differ from USDA texture is on the soil types hub.
Frequently asked questions
- What is loamy sand?
- A USDA texture class of 70–90% sand with just enough silt and clay to hold a ball when moist. It drains fast and holds about 1.1 inches of water per foot of soil.[1][2][3]
- What is the difference between loamy sand and sandy loam?
- Loamy sand is sandier and won’t ribbon. Sandy loam has more silt and clay, makes a short gritty ribbon, and holds more water: a median 1.6 inches per foot against 1.1.[2][3]
- Does loamy sand drain well?
- Mostly. 77.4% of its acres are well drained or drier, but 14.1% is somewhat poorly to very poorly drained, so check a low spot before you plant for drought.[3][4]
- Is loamy sand good for a garden?
- It works with compost and regular watering. 53% of its rated acres are in the land-capability classes suited to cultivation, well ahead of pure sand.[10][3][8]
- Where is loamy sand found?
- Texas, Georgia and California have the most acres. As a share of a state’s own soil it peaks in Georgia, at 32%.[3]
How we calculate this
Each soil component in USDA's detailed soil surveys gets the texture class of its surface horizon, the first horizon below any organic (O) layer, using the sand, silt and clay limits of the Soil Survey Manual. Miscellaneous areas such as Urban land, rock outcrop and water are counted separately and not classified, and so are organic soils (Histosols), even where a mineral layer lies under their organic surface. A component whose surface horizon has no sand, silt and clay values also stays unclassified.
- Acres are weighted by each soil component's share of its map unit (USDA's representative percent) and summed across 3,386 detailed USDA soil surveys.
- A class's share is of the 1,915.5 million acres that carry a texture class; states are the 50 states plus DC.
- Data generated 2026-10-30.
- More in our methodology.
Sources
- USDA NRCS, Soil Survey Manual (Agriculture Handbook 18), Ch. 3 “Examination and Description of Soil Profiles” (Soil Science Division Staff; eds. Ditzler, Scheffe, Monger; 2017)
- Colorado State University Extension, Estimating Soil Texture (GardenNotes #214)
- USDA NRCS, Soil Survey Geographic Database (SSURGO), via Soil Data Access
- USDA NRCS, Soil Survey Manual (Agriculture Handbook 18), Ch. 3: drainage classes
- USDA NRCS, National Engineering Handbook, Part 630, Chapter 7: Hydrologic Soil Groups (January 2009)
- Purdue Extension, Maintaining Lawns on Sandy Soils (AGRY-98-03)
- Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Minnesota Stormwater Manual, Soil erodibility
- USDA Soil Conservation Service, Land-Capability Classification (Agriculture Handbook 210; Klingebiel and Montgomery, 1961)
- USDA NRCS, Farmland Protection Policy Act (7 U.S.C. 4201): definitions of prime, unique and statewide or local farmland
- Colorado State University Extension, Soil Amendments (GardenNotes #241; reviewed Sept 2024)
- USDA NRCS Official Series Description, TIFTON
- USDA NRCS, National Soil Survey Handbook, Part 618, section 618.42: Linear extensibility percent (shrink-swell classes)
- OSHA, 29 CFR 1926 Subpart P, Appendix A “Soil Classification” (U.S. Department of Labor)
Marko Visic · MPharm, BSc Physics · Last reviewed November 13, 2026