Histosols: Organic Soils of Peat, Mucky Peat and Muck
Histosols are the soil order made of organic material, the peats and mucks that build up in bogs, fens and other wet ground.[1] Below: the rule that makes a soil a Histosol, how peat differs from muck, the suborders, why drained Histosols sink, and where USDA’s survey maps them.
Is your soil a Histosol?
Enter an address to see the soil order USDA maps there.
US addresses only: street address, city and state, or ZIP.
What makes a soil a Histosol
NRCS gives a general rule: a soil is classified as a Histosol if half or more of the upper 31 inches (80 cm) is organic. Histosols are high in organic matter, have no permafrost, and go by common names such as bogs, moors, peats and mucks. Most are saturated year round, though a few are freely drained.[2]
What counts as organic is set by carbon: soil material is organic at 12% or more organic carbon by weight, the threshold our soil horizons page gives with the O horizon.[3]
The same rule settles the forest-floor question. A thin forest-floor O horizon over mineral soil doesn’t make a Histosol: it falls far short of half the upper 31 inches (80 cm).[2]
Histosols form where organic matter such as leaves, mosses or grasses decomposes more slowly than it accumulates, most often in extremely wet places or under water. The name comes from the Greek histos, tissue, and they cover about 1% of the world’s glacier-free land.[1]
Peat, mucky peat and muck
The Soil Survey Manual grades organic soil material by how far it has decomposed:[4]
- Peat is slightly decomposed organic material with a high content of original fibers.
- Mucky peat is intermediate between muck and peat in decomposition, fiber content, bulk density and water content.
- Muck is well decomposed, with a low content of fibers (plant tissue, not counting live roots).[4]
These materials count as Soil Taxonomy’s diagnostic sapric, fibric and hemic soil materials only in organic soils: the Histosols and the Histels suborder of Gelisols.[4]
The four suborders NRCS describes
- Folists are the more or less freely drained Histosols, made mainly of horizons from leaf litter, twigs and branches resting on bedrock or on fragmental material. The largest extent is in Hawaii and Alaska.
- Fibrists are the wet, slightly decomposed Histosols, most extensive in southern Alaska.
- Hemists are wet Histosols whose organic material is moderately decomposed, most extensive in Minnesota and Alaska.
- Saprists are wet Histosols whose organic material is well decomposed. The largest extent is in Michigan, Florida, Wisconsin, Minnesota and Alaska.[2]
Some Hemists and Saprists have been cleared and drained and are used as cropland.[2] The survey data doesn’t record suborders, so the page gives no acres for them.
What Histosols are like
In USDA’s survey, 99.9% of described Histosol acres have an O (organic) horizon, and on 33.1 of 48.8 million acres (67.8%) the first mineral layer lies under organic material. The most common sequences are O–C (18.8 million acres), O (16.6 million acres), O–W–C (3.2 million acres) and O–R (2.5 million acres); the W in O–W–C marks a water layer, one of the master layers our soil horizons page defines. An A horizon appears on only 6.5% of the acres, and where a parent material is recorded it’s organic material on 98.9%.[5][4]
The material is light. Histosol bulk densities are quite low, often less than 0.3 g/cm³, the University of Idaho notes, and most Histosols form in wetlands, where restricted drainage holds back the decomposition of plant and animal remains so the organic material accumulates over time.[6]
For comparison, the first mineral layers of the other orders have median bulk densities from 0.80 to 1.45 g/cm³ in the survey.[5][7]
83.8% of the acres are in a dual hydrologic group such as A/D, where the first letter applies only once the land is drained, and 15.2% are in group D, where water soaks in slowly.[5][9]
Why drained Histosols sink
Subsidence when drained is one of the physical properties the University of Idaho lists as restricting Histosols for engineering, beside low weight-bearing capacity.[6]
The Soil Science Society of America gives the mechanism: once drained, Histosols can decompose rapidly and subside dramatically, even though drained Histosols can be highly productive farmland.[1]
Building on Histosols
They make poor ground for it. Histosols aren’t stable for foundations or roadways and may be highly acidic.[1] Their low weight-bearing capacity and subsidence when drained are the engineering limits named above.[6]
For one address, the building site checker and the septic suitability checker show USDA’s ratings for the soil mapped there.
Farming on Histosols
Almost none of the order is prime farmland as mapped: 0.0% of Histosol acres, against 12.5% of all US soil acres, with another 0.8% prime if drained, protected or irrigated and 6.6% of statewide or local importance. 73.9% of rated acres are in capability Classes VII and VIII, and excess water (subclass w) is the hazard on 74.4%.[5][10][11]
| Farmland class | Share of Histosol acres |
|---|---|
| Prime farmland | 0.0% |
| Prime if drained, protected or irrigated | 0.8% |
| Statewide or local importance | 6.6% |
| Not prime | 92.6% |
Drained ones are another matter: NRCS notes that some cleared and drained Hemists and Saprists are cropland, and the Soil Science Society of America calls drained Histosols potentially highly productive, at the cost of the subsidence above.[2][1]
Where Histosols are in the US
- 1. Alaska: 21.5M
- 2. Minnesota: 7.0M
- 3. Florida: 4.1M
- 4. Michigan: 3.8M
- 5. Wisconsin: 3.3M
- 6. Louisiana: 1.9M
- 7. North Carolina: 1.3M
- 8. Maine: 1.1M
- 9. New York: 811k
- 10. Hawaii: 367k
Alaska has the most, 21.5 million acres, then Minnesota (7.0 million) and Florida (4.1 million). Histosols aren’t the leading order in any state, but as a share of a state’s own soil acres they reach 14.4% in Minnesota:[5]
| State | Share of the state’s soil acres | Million acres |
|---|---|---|
| Minnesota | 14.4% | 7.0 |
| Hawaii | 12.5% | 0.4 |
| Florida | 12.4% | 4.1 |
| Michigan | 10.8% | 3.8 |
| Wisconsin | 9.7% | 3.3 |
| Louisiana | 7.4% | 1.9 |
| Alaska | 7.3% | 21.5 |
| Massachusetts | 6.8% | 0.3 |
Most widespread Histosol series
| Series | Acres | Most in | Survey areas |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cathro | 1,853,387 | Minnesota | 133 |
| Greenwood | 1,449,734 | Minnesota | 78 |
| Lupton | 1,353,442 | Michigan | 76 |
| Rifle | 1,072,274 | Minnesota | 57 |
| Houghton | 1,066,686 | Michigan | 218 |
| Dorovan | 727,902 | Florida | 73 |
Cathro (Minnesota), Greenwood (Minnesota) and Lupton (Michigan) cover the most ground; each links to its official USDA description.[5][12]
Histosols compared with other orders
Histosols rank ninth of the twelve orders by US acres. In the table their surface pH and topsoil (A) columns show a dash, for the reason in the note below it.[5]
| Order | Share | Median A | Surface pH | Prime farmland |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfisols | 14.9% | 7.1 in | 6.2 | 20.6% |
| Andisols | 1.6% | 8.3 in | 5.8 | 1.8% |
| Aridisols | 8.7% | 3.5 in | 7.9 | 0.1% |
| Entisols | 12.5% | 5.1 in | 7.4 | 3.0% |
| Gelisols | 6.3% | 3.9 in | 5.3 | 0.0% |
| Histosols | 2.4% | — | — | 0.0% |
| Inceptisols | 13.8% | 5.1 in | 5.6 | 5.3% |
| Mollisols | 23.6% | 9.8 in | 7.0 | 23.2% |
| Oxisols | 0.0% | 5.9 in | 5.1 | 20.7% |
| Spodosols | 4.5% | 3.9 in | 4.8 | 2.2% |
| Ultisols | 9.6% | 5.9 in | 5.3 | 24.0% |
| Vertisols | 2.1% | 7.1 in | 7.3 | 32.2% |
Histosols show a dash: their surface is organic material (peat or muck), so a topsoil (A) or surface pH median would describe mineral soil beneath it.
Frequently asked questions
- What are Histosols?
- Organic soils: as a general rule, half or more of the upper 31 inches (80 cm) is organic. They have no permafrost, and most are saturated year round.[2]
- What soil order is organic soil?
- Histosols, the order dominated by organic material in its upper part: bogs, moors, fens, peats and mucks.[1]
- What is the difference between peat and muck?
- Decomposition. Peat is slightly decomposed and full of original fibers; muck is well decomposed with few fibers; mucky peat sits between them.[4]
- Is a forest floor an organic soil?
- Not in the Histosol sense. A thin forest-floor O horizon over mineral soil falls far short of the rule that half or more of the upper 31 inches (80 cm) be organic.[2]
- Why do drained Histosols sink?
- Drained, their organic material can decompose rapidly, and the soil subsides.[1]
- Can you build on Histosols?
- They’re poor ground for it: low weight-bearing capacity, subsidence when drained, and no stability for foundations or roads.[6][1]
- What does ‘Histosol’ mean?
- It comes from the Greek histos, tissue.[1]
How we calculate this
Acres come from USDA SSURGO via Soil Data Access, weighted by each soil component's share of its map unit (USDA's representative percent) and summed across 3,386 detailed USDA soil surveys; shares are of the US acres that have a recorded order. Surface medians (pH, organic matter, water held, Ksat and bulk density) are of each component's first mineral layer below any organic (O) layer. Topsoil thickness, horizon sequences, farmland class and parent material come from a matching read of one profile per soil component. Data generated 2026-10-07.
Drainage class, hydrologic soil group, pH class, land capability, shrink-swell and in-state shares come from our soil-order profile aggregation of the same surveys (data generated 2026-10-30); in-state shares rank the 50 states and DC with at least 1,000,000 acres that have an order.
Why this page shows no surface medians or textures: our order figures read each soil’s surface properties from its first mineral layer below any organic layer. For Histosols that layer lies under the organic material on 33.1 of 48.8 million acres, so a median pH, organic matter or texture would describe buried mineral soil, not the peat or muck, and a topsoil (A) median would describe the few profiles with an A horizon. The CSV keeps its texture rows, which are that first mineral layer’s texture.
- More in our methodology.
Sources
- Soil Science Society of America (soils4teachers), The Soil Orders Simplified (D. Lindbo)
- USDA NRCS, Histosols
- USDA NRCS, Keys to Soil Taxonomy, 13th ed. (Soil Survey Staff; 2022)
- USDA NRCS, Soil Survey Manual (Agriculture Handbook 18), Ch. 3 “Examination and Description of Soil Profiles” (Soil Science Division Staff; eds. Ditzler, Scheffe, Monger; 2017)
- USDA NRCS, Soil Survey Geographic Database (SSURGO), via Soil Data Access
- University of Idaho, College of Agricultural and Life Sciences, Soil Orders: Histosols
- USDA NRCS Soil Health Guide, Bulk Density
- USDA NRCS, Soil Survey Manual (Agriculture Handbook 18), Ch. 3: drainage classes
- USDA NRCS, National Engineering Handbook, Part 630, Chapter 7: Hydrologic Soil Groups (January 2009)
- USDA NRCS, Farmland Protection Policy Act (7 U.S.C. 4201): definitions of prime, unique and statewide or local farmland
- USDA Soil Conservation Service, Land-Capability Classification (Agriculture Handbook 210; Klingebiel and Montgomery, 1961)
- USDA NRCS, Official Soil Series Descriptions (OSD) fact sheet
Marko Visic · MPharm, BSc Physics · Last reviewed November 13, 2026